Biden Nominee Jackson Defends Lenient Child Porn Sentences By Saying 15 Minutes of Crime Shouldn't Ruin One's Life ... Lindsey Graham Absolutely Destroys Her
· · Mar 23, 2022 · NottheBee.com

I don't agree with Lindsey Graham on a lot of things, but when he's right, he's right.

In Wednesday's Supreme Court nomination hearing, South Carolina's Lindsey Graham asked Ketanji Brown Jackson to explain why she goes soft on distributors of child porn.

Her answer doesn't satisfy Senator Graham and he lets her know it:

Graham absolutely destroys Jackson, even with the Democrats trying to help her out.

Jackson: "On the internet, with one click, you can receive you can distribute TENS OF THOUSANDS (of child pornographic images). You can be doing this for 15 minutes and all of a sudden you are looking at 30, 40, 50 years in prison—"

Graham: "Good! Good! Absolutely right! I hope you would! I hope you go to jail for 50 years if you're on the internet trolling for children in sexual exploitation – see you don't think that's a bad thing, I think that's a horrible thing."

Graham is 100% correct here, and it's appropriate to call out Judge Jackson for not recognizing the severity of the crime.

As usual, The Bee nailed it:

Jackson's argument is illogical. She says because the crime is easy to commit and takes no time, that people shouldn't be given a harsh punishment.

Jackson is nothing more than a soft on criminals activist judge.

This lady doesn't belong anywhere near the Supreme Court. Or a schoolyard for that matter.


P.S. Now check out our viral video "How to speak Bidenese" 😂👇

Keep up with our latest videos — Subscribe to our YouTube channel!

Comments

There are 79 comments on this article.

Ready to join the conversation? Start your free trial today.

Access comments and our fully-featured social platform, completely free of charge.

Sign up Now
App screenshot

You must signup or login to view or post comments on this article.