The New York Times, everyone.
Meanwhile, here's what anyone with a brain knew within hours of the shooting yesterday. 👇
The killer in Minnesota was a young man who thought he was a girl, his mom worked at the school he shot up, and he formerly attended the same school.
He had a sticker of a transgender flag with an AK-47 and the word "equality," showcasing common "Trantifa" (transgender Antifa) threats of violence.
He also mocked Christ and Christians, as well as Jews.
He drew a layout of the church and then stabbed it with a knife. On video.
But the most prestigious newspaper on the planet doesn't know what his motive is. They made sure to call him a "her" though!!
We know the killer was part of the transgender cult, we know he knew the church well, we know he talked about talking with demons. We know he hated BlackRock and had anarchist/Antifa leanings. We know he was suicidal and wanted to inflict maximum fear on soft targets.
From his manifesto:
That's one of my biggest fears is getting tackled and arrested. Especially before I am able to inflict a lot of damage and death.
But we can't be sure of his motive.
The Minneapolis police said the same thing.
It's funny how politicians, police, and the media spout out a motive immediately when, say, a Catholic kid wearing a MAGA hat is on TV.
They immediately pronounced that Nicholas Sandmann was harassing a Native America guy (a lie). They knew that Kyle Rittenhouse was a murderer (a lie). They said Derek Chauvin kneeled on George Floyd's neck (a lie) because of systemic racism (a lie). They said a young man shot up an Asian massage parlor in Georgia because he was racist (a lie). They said Donald Trump thinks white supremacists are "very fine people" (a lie).
All the fake news does is give us lies about motive when it fits their agenda.
But when it comes to Islamic terrorism or Trantifa shooters with demonic scribblings who target churches for the expressed desire of killing Christian kids?
MOTIVE UNKNOWN!!
P.S. Now check out our latest video 👇
