Guys, I'm not exactly an art critic, but in my own non-professional opinion let me say this: Wut?
So, this is the first official portrait of King Charles since his coronation and it's maybe the weirdest portrait I've seen since, well, maybe Obama's fake and gay portrait.
I mean, back to Charles, what the heck am I looking at? Why is it so red? What's going on here?
Needless to say, the general consensus over on X dot com is that the portrait is a flaming dog turd.
I mean, some say it's satanic because it's red. But I don't think it's that deep. It's just a bad picture.
Here are some particularly harsh reactions.
These guys hate it.
Of course, for the contrarian take, we always have Michael Knowles.
Oh, Michael ...
You don't have to ask me, but I think this is one of the stupidest things I've ever seen.
I guess we can ask what you think. Is this a good portrait or a bad portrait?
P.S. Now check out our latest video 👇
