Another famous historical woman disappears as The New York Times suggests "Little Women" author Louisa May Alcott was a trans man 🤡

A New York Times opinion writer just tried to erase one of the most influential female writers that has ever lived.

It's doubtful whether any book has had as much of an effect on modern women's lives than Louisa May Alcott's Little Women. Even at its debut in 1868, it sold out in two weeks. Since then, the book has never been out of print. Movie adaptations are nearly always extremely popular.

The book is an important part of our history and culture, so it should come as no surprise that woke culture would look to tear it down.

Peyton Thomas, a trans "man," asks the question:

What would it mean if the mother of young adult literature were actually the genre's father?

That's right. Louisa May Alcott didn't accomplish anything because she was a woman. All of her accomplishments were because she was a man trapped in a woman's body (who Peyton repeatedly calls "Lou").

The opinion piece also erases the main character Jo, who girls have loved for over a hundred years, by suggesting that she too was a trans man.

Of course, Alcott wasn't Lou, she was Louisa, and she marked her claim on history as a woman.

The attempt to erase her accomplishments as a woman shows a lot about what the trans movement is looking to do. It's similar to what the movement did to Joan of Arc at the Globe Theatre this year, giving her "they/them" pronouns in a play – along with making Queen Elizabeth I "non-binary."

The message is that the only way for a woman to be successful is if she is actually a man.

That is quite literally the opposite of what Alcott was promoting in Little Women by suggesting that women have as much to offer the world as men do.