I'd laugh at the phrase "her testes" if this wasn't such damnable stuff:
The demand for transgender surgery has increased by five-fold over the past five years.
Well, maybe that's less about acceptance and more about active psychological grooming, teaching kids gender is made up, and pumping that toxic garbage everywhere you look.
She goes on to say that, yes, it's only until after 18 when children can choose for themselves to undergo these surgeries. However, she doesn't mention that with parental consent it can be done earlier.
Isn't it interesting that these totally "safe" and "reversible" hormone procedures can result in sterilization?
However, if as soon as pubertal blockers were added and then estrogen was added to her [sic] therapy...
Remember, this is a boy we're talking about. Don't let the speaker's woke word salad confuse you.
Avery's testes never developed. In fact, she [sic] does not make any sperm. And her [sic] reproductive capability to be a biological parent has been eliminated. Her [sic] testes are non-functional. And in medicine, don't we often recommend the removal of non-functional organs? Like an appendix?
So therefore, does it make sense for Avery to wait till she's [sic] 18, or should older adolescents be allowed to have surgery before the age of 18?
They've groomed these kid for years in the radical world of sex and gender confusion, so the argument is that they should be treated like an adult even if they aren't yet 18.
No way THAT could ever be abused by perverts wanting to sexualize minors, right?
The world has gone absolutely mad.
Remember this video, remember what they said.
