The respected UK medical journal Lancet wants to undergo a major paradigm shift.
And when we say major, we mean it.
The journal wants to focus on "ecological equity," meaning animals and plants will presumably receive the same level of value as humans.
In other words, the "save the planet, kill the humans" people have officially infiltrated the medical community.
Form Breitbart:
In its advocacy for "One Health," the Lancet proposes "an integrated, unifying approach that aims to sustainably balance and optimise the health of people, animals, and ecosystems," asserting that "the health of humans, domestic and wild animals, plants, and the wider environment (including ecosystems) are closely linked and inter-dependent."
The traditional approach to health care takes "a purely anthropocentric view — that the human being is the centre of medical attention and concern," the Lancet declares, whereas One Health "places us in an interconnected and interdependent relationship with non-human animals and the environment."
Yes, they want you to know that human beings have no special worth, are no different than plants or animals, and that when we make "health" decisions we should think about what's best for the planet as a whole.
You know, just like the human extinction movement that believes human beings are a blight on the planet.
But this isn't some fringe wacko taking this approach. It's The Lancet, one of the most respected medical journals on the planet!
The revolutionary shift of perspective called for by One Health is based on the more progressive axiom that "all life is equal, and of equal concern," the journal proposes, which means "addressing pressing health issues at the human – animal – environment interface."
Such a shift "requires a complete change to our relationship with animals," the Lancet asserts, which is why the journal recommends transition "from an animal-based diet to a plant-based one, which not only benefits human health, but also animal health and wellbeing."
In its revolutionary proposal, the Lancet suggests that the life of a human being is not necessarily worth more than the life of any non-human animal.
The wacky vegans and soy boys are advocating for a plant-based diet for all people because they believe you are equal to a bug.
I can't stress this enough, but this is from an influential medical journal.
And they are completely disregarding human worth.
One Health demands that we take a fundamentally different approach to the natural world, the journal contends, "one in which we are as concerned about the welfare of non-human animals and the environment as we are about humans."
"In its truest sense, One Health is a call for ecological, not merely health, equity," it concludes.
"Equity" means forced equality in all things.
In this case, it means degrading humans down to the level of animals. If you follow the thought experiment to its rational conclusions, you will end up with the same mass genocide that occurred among the people who did the same in generations past.
