Woke Preacher Says Jesus "Transgendered" Himself When Washing The Disciples' Feet And I Don't Think That's In The Bible
· Jan 20, 2022 · NottheBee.com

What in the wide world of woke nonsense is happening at this Baptist "church" in England?

Simon Woodman, a "pastor" at London's Bloomsbury Central Baptist Church, makes a mockery of himself and mocks God when he says that Jesus "transgendered" himself multiple times in the gospels.

Watch:

I think Jesus transgenders himself on a number of occasions. I think that just the little phrase, Jesus is lamenting over Jerusalem longing to gather Jerusalem as a mother hen gathers her chicks.

I think if you look at the foot washing from John's gospel, foot washing elsewhere, in both Old and New Testament, it's consistently done by women. Yet Jesus takes that on. People often cast that as being the servants role. It was the woman's role. And Jesus does it and becomes the woman at that point.

I'm sorry, did you just say that because Jesus washed his disciple's feet he "becomes the woman at that point"?

Outside lower-class homes, foot washing was normally done by servants, and due to very strict cultural norms regarding the mixing of the sexes, it's unlikely that a female servant was there to wash a bunch of strange men's feet in a rented room. But even if his historical analysis were correct and complete, that doesn't mean that someone automatically, or spiritually, or in any way becomes a woman when they do such a job.

I don't recall a clause under Genesis 1:27 that says our male or female identity is suspended if we do a job that's perceived by current cultural norms to be reserved for the other sex. That's like saying that when a husband changes a diaper or gives his child a bottle he becomes a woman in that moment.

What utter and ridiculous nonsense!

But wait, there's more.

Believing that Jesus was a physical human man, and that God created two genders, is "heteronormative idolatry" according to this pastor.

.

.

.

There's some notes of Docetism and Monarchianism right there. Dude needs to study up on the First Council of Nicaea's rejection of the former in in 325 AD and read the rebuttal Tertullian wrote to the latter in 213 AD.

I can't even begin to understand where this dude is coming from. He agrees with another panelist that God is "queer," so there's probably some Gnosticism and other fun heresies mixed in there.

Everything about this heresy is an absolute mockery of the God of the Bible, but remember, nothing is new under the sun!


P.S. Now check out our latest video 👇

Keep up with our latest videos — Subscribe to our YouTube channel!

Ready to join the conversation? Subscribe today.

Access comments and our fully-featured social platform.

Sign up Now
App screenshot

You must signup or login to view or post comments on this article.