I don't agree with Lindsey Graham on a lot of things, but when he's right, he's right.
In Wednesday's Supreme Court nomination hearing, South Carolina's Lindsey Graham asked Ketanji Brown Jackson to explain why she goes soft on distributors of child porn.
Her answer doesn't satisfy Senator Graham and he lets her know it:
Graham absolutely destroys Jackson, even with the Democrats trying to help her out.
Jackson: "On the internet, with one click, you can receive you can distribute TENS OF THOUSANDS (of child pornographic images). You can be doing this for 15 minutes and all of a sudden you are looking at 30, 40, 50 years in prison—"
Graham: "Good! Good! Absolutely right! I hope you would! I hope you go to jail for 50 years if you're on the internet trolling for children in sexual exploitation – see you don't think that's a bad thing, I think that's a horrible thing."
Graham is 100% correct here, and it's appropriate to call out Judge Jackson for not recognizing the severity of the crime.
As usual, The Bee nailed it:
Jackson's argument is illogical. She says because the crime is easy to commit and takes no time, that people shouldn't be given a harsh punishment.
Jackson is nothing more than a soft on criminals activist judge.
This lady doesn't belong anywhere near the Supreme Court. Or a schoolyard for that matter.
P.S. Now check out our latest video 👇
