Holy moly. I'll just let this man do the talking.

I don't know how much of this is true and how much is just an embellishment.

(I do know that a lot of good men and women were put in a bad situation where they were forced to "act on impulse" when someone unlocked all the doors to the Capitol on J6.)

"Once they act on that impulse..."

"We call it a nudge..."

How wretchedly evil!!

I get that law enforcement wants to catch the bad guys, but enticing bad guys and entrapping 72-year-old Christian grandmas is wildly different. It's not a "fine line." It's the difference between good and evil.

My thoughts go to the mysterious federal shootout with the executive director of the Bill and Hillary Clinton National Airport, who was shot in his home during an early-morning raid last month by a stack of armed ATF agents. They were concerned the man was trafficking guns, but they kicked down his door at 6 a.m. and shot him because he dared shoot at the intruders in his home.

Maybe he actually was a bad guy, but it seems weird to kick in a man's door while he's sleeping instead of arresting him literally anywhere else. So why do it? Why put agents at risk (one agent was shot) if you wanted to arrest the man alive?

The phrase "act on impulse" comes to mind.

Let's play devil's advocate and say this CIA guy is just lying. After all, it seems like every gay guy in Washington is ready to spill state secrets over a Tinder date these days, and as a contracting officer with a desk job, he's probably wildly overblowing his own importance and knowledge.

Even so, this dude is clearly disturbed and he works at the CIA/FBI!! How many sickos like this are working at these agencies?

A few reactions:

P.S. Now check out our latest video 👇