Need a good laugh?

How about this paragraph from a CNN article?

Let's put aside the clause dealing with gender identity, since the Left has crafted that definition into subjective theological ideology based on personal feelings.

Instead, let's turn to the hard biological science of dichotomous sex.

The super objective CNN says that there is NO criteria to determine sex.

Apparently they forgot about these:

Take a look at some other super unbiased clauses CNN uses to describe this story about South Dakota protecting women's sports from being dominated by biological men:

• "[The executive orders signed by Gov. Kristi Noem] ​reference the supposed harms of the participation of 'males' in women's athletics -- an echo of the transphobic claim, cited in other similar legislative initiatives, that transgender women are not women."
• "Trans advocates and ​some Democratic lawmakers contend that they're discriminatory​, citing the natural variations that appear in athletes at all levels and of all genders."
• "Advocates say actions like the governor's show the type of political hostility facing transgender Americans."

Writer Devan Cole then ends the story with multiple quotes from transgender ideology advocates.

I have no problem with people expressing their opinion. There's just one problem.

This article isn't labeled as opinion: it's presented as factual, objective news.

If there's ever a time to stop trusting the objectivity of the media, it's now.