More bad news for fake and Gay Harvard.
The New York Post says it has known since October of President Gay's alleged plagiarism, but at the time they were gathering information for the exposè, Harvard threatened The Post over the story.
Yesterday, we found out Harvard doesn't consider these multiple instances of plagiarism a very big deal. However, in October they considered it a VERY big deal and lawyered up over it.
According to the New York Post, they had been investigating this plagiarism since late October thanks to an anonymous tip and had reached out to Harvard for statements about the investigation.
That's when Harvard lawyered up and came back with threats against the Post.
According to yesterday's letter, Harvard identified 4 instances in 2 works where Gay used "improper citations" and missed quotation marks and those works would be edited for correction.
The Post is alleging that the problem is much deeper than Harvard is willing to admit.
The Post contacted the university on October 24, asking for comment on more than two dozen instances in which Gay's words appeared to closely parallel words, phrases or sentences in published works by other academics.
The 27 instances were in two academic papers published in two peer-reviewed journals between 2011 and 2017, and an article in an academic magazine in 1993.
From 27 instances of potential plagiarism down to 4.
Jonathan Swain, a former Clinton aide and a member of the Biden-Harris transition team who works now as Harvard's senior executive director of media relations and communications, was asked about these allegations and said he'd get back to The Post.
That was in October. He never did get back to NYP and possibly started the ball rolling on the coverup.
And two days later, on Oct. 27, The Post was sent a 15-page letter by Thomas Clare, a high-powered Virginia-based attorney with the firm Clare-Locke who identified himself as defamation counsel for Harvard University and Gay.
The letter contained comments from academics whose work Gay was alleged to have improperly cited — even though the political scientists' review could only just have begun.
The Post has details of the many papers Gay has allegedly plagiarized and asserts that Harvard is not addressing the full extent of the problem.
Two days later, on Oct. 27, The Post was sent a 15-page letter by Thomas Clare, a high-powered Virginia-based attorney with the firm Clare-Locke who identified himself as defamation counsel for Harvard University and Gay.
THEY THREATENED A NEWSPAPER WITH A LAWYER OVER LEGITIMATE CONCERNS OF PLAGIARISM!
So why is Harvard willing to stake its entire reputation on their president when UPenn just got rid of theirs?
This is "anti-racism," ladies and gents. It's poison, and Harvard has injected it straight into its veins.
I guess it's time for the next phase of the battle!
P.S. Now check out our latest video 👇
