We've reported several times on a straight-up clown world transgender case coming out of the University of Wyoming:
And I mean, we can't say we're that surprised by this outcome, can we?
Six members of the Kappa Kappa Gamma sorority chapter had challenged Artemis Langford's admission by casting doubt on whether sorority rules allowed a transgender woman.
A district court judge found in favor of the sorority and Langford, ruling that the sorority's bylaws - as a private, voluntary organization - don't define who's a woman.
Of course, that's a clever dodge from the judge. The sorority's bylaws don't define "who's a woman" because "woman" is already defined: By science, for instance, and by thousands of years of human civilization.
I mean, they didn't define the word "house" in the bylaws, either, but I think we all know what they mean when they write "sorority house," right?
Do you think you could figure out who is and who isn't a woman in this photo?
Take your time, we'll wait!
I want you to understand what Judge Alan Johnson did.
Earlier this year, he forced these young women to go public, revealing their names and photos, in order to sue for negligence and sexual harassment.
The women were ordered to reveal their names by U.S. District Judge Alan Johnson, who is handling the case in the Cheyenne branch of the U.S. District Court.
Now, after dragging the victims' names into the public eye, he's decided to toss the case because a U.S. court can't define something a toddler knows by instinct.
With its inquiry beginning and ending there, the court will not define a 'woman' today.
The delegate of a private, voluntary organization interpreted ‘woman', otherwise undefined in the non-profit's bylaws, expansively; this Judge may not invade Kappa Kappa Gamma's freedom of expressive association and inject the circumscribed definition Plaintiffs urge."
How evil does one have to be?
(And what happened to those #MeToo, #BelieveAllWomen hashtags?)
Let's get into the allegations:
In addition to obviously being a man, "Artemis Langford's" behavior was quite plainly predatory: He would reportedly regularly stare at the sorority sisters "for hours without saying anything, while sitting with a pillow in [his] lap;" he also allegedly took photos of the girls and asked them questions such as "what vaginas look like, breast cup size, whether women were considering breast reductions and birth control."
I guess the awful and predatory experience of being interrogated about sex and anatomy by a mentally ill man in a woman's-only space is immaterial now. That's just the way it is, ladies.
(If the legal system can't define "woman," how will it define crime?)
At least the lines are clearly drawn. It's not hard to tell who's a man — and it's not hard to tell who doesn't care about the safety and well-being of women.
In the meantime, stay safe out there, women. U.S. judges in [checks notes] Wyoming certainly won't protect you.
P.S. Now check out our latest video 👇
