Nancy Pelosi Spent Half A Million On Private Jets The Last Two Years, But She Thinks You Have A Moral Obligation To Reduce Emissions
ยท Feb 7, 2022 ยท NottheBee.com

Just so you know, climate change is THE most important issue on the entire planet. And you need to do everything within your power to combat it. It's your moral obligation!

Unless you're Speaker of the House and climate alarmist, Nancy Pelosi.

Then you can tell everyone else what to do and use half a million dollars to fly on private jets.

.

.

.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi has spent over $500,000 on private jets since 2020 despite repeatedly describing climate change as an "existential" threat the U.S. has a "moral" obligation to address.

According to campaign filings with the Federal Election Commission, Pelosi's campaign paid a Virginia-based private aviation provider, Advanced Aviation Team, over $437,000 between October 2020 and December 2021 and over $65,000 to Clay Lacy Aviation, a California-based private jet provider.

Pelosi can call climate change and reducing emissions a moral issue. But when it comes to her own life, I guess she has no morals.

Private jets are notoriously bad for the environment, producing significantly more emissions per passenger than commercial flights. Pelosi's campaign spent $67,605 on private air travel just months before she said she viewed tackling the climate crisis as a "religious thing."

"For me, it's a religious thing," she said in November after leading a 21-member congressional delegation to the United Nations Climate Change Conference in Glasgow, Scotland. "I believe this is God's creation, and we have a moral obligation to be good stewards."

Pelosi came under fire in September after she claimed climate change was even more of a priority to discuss with China than its multitude of human rights abuses.

"Climate is an overriding issue, and China is a leading emitter in the world," she said at the time.

For a practitioner of the religion of climate change, flying in a private jet and increasing fuel emissions exponentially should be a cardinal sin.

It would be like Pelosi claiming to be a religious Catholic and still supporting the murder of the unborn through abortion.

Well, I guess that Pelosi is a flaming hypocrite, no matter what religion she's claiming.

But remember, it's YOUR moral duty to reduce emissions!


P.S. Now check out our latest video ๐Ÿ‘‡

Keep up with our latest videos โ€” Subscribe to our YouTube channel!

Ready to join the conversation? Subscribe today.

Access comments and our fully-featured social platform.

Sign up Now
App screenshot

You must signup or login to view or post comments on this article.