Recently diagnosed Covid patient Dr. Anthony Fauci virtually called into a Senate hearing on Thursday in order to get his rear end handed to him by Rand Paul... again.
The Science™ was asked if he could provide ANY scientific data that giving vax boosters to young people helped AT ALL in preventing Covid or keeping people healthier.
I mean, that was absolutely brutal.
A few highlights:
There are no studies, and Americans should all know this, there are no studies on children showing a reduction of hospitalizations or death with taking a booster.
The only studies that were permitted, the only studies that were presented, were antibodies studies.
So they say if we give you a booster you make antibodies.
Now a lot of scientists would question if that's proof of efficacy of a vaccine.
If I give you ten, or if I give a patient, ten MRNA vaccines and they make protein each time or they make antibodies each time, is that proof we should give ten boosters Dr. Fauci?
Fauci then tries to call Paul's example "absurd" when it is the very same data he is using to recommend any boosters AT ALL for young people.
There is no proof that creating more antibodies in young people prevents serious illness, yet that is still what the government and Fauci recommend.
Paul then goes for the jugular, bringing up the statistics about the risks of the vax. Something that Fauci and the government refuse to countenance.
Here's the other thing, there are some risk factors for the vaccine.
So the risk of Myocarditis for the second dose for adolescent boys, 12-24, is about 80 in a million. This is both from the CDC and the Israeli study. It's also in the VAERS study. Remarkably similar. For boys, much higher for boys than girls and much higher than the background. The background is about 2 per million.
So there is risk and there are risks and you're telling everyone in America to just blindly go out there, because we made antibodies. So it is not an absurd corollary to say if you have ten. In fact, you probably make antibodies if you get 100 boosters, alright?
That's not science. It's conjecture. And we should not be making public policy on it.
Isn't The Science™ tired of losing yet?
P.S. Now check out our latest video 👇
