Report: Two of America's biggest newspapers killed stories on research that shows how DEI practices make people meaner and more authoritarian
ยท Nov 26, 2024 ยท NottheBee.com

The sweet corporate HR lady is, indeed, the root of all kinds of evil.

Wait, you're telling me that corporations and schools pushing the woke mind virus contributes to negatives in society?

And you're telling me that two of America's major news publications decided to spike the story on it?

According to Colin Wright's report, The New York Times and Bloomberg were both working on stories that would have tied Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion policies at work to some really dangerous (some would say psycho) stuff.

If you're someone on our side of the aisle who has paid a lick of attention you know that DEI trainings which serve to reinforce the Marxist oppressor/oppressed matrix would obviously breed hostility, authoritarianism, and extremism. It's the nature of the Commie beast.

But the DEI shills at the NYT and Bloomberg decided not to report on the truth because it made their left-wing beliefs look bad or something.

Here's more from Wright:

The study was conducted by the Network Contagion Research Institute (NCRI) in collaboration with Rutgers University. It investigated the psychological effects of DEI pedagogy, specifically trainings that draw heavily from texts like 'How to Be an Antiracist' and 'White Fragility.'

These are books recommended by corporations, schools, and government agencies across the US, by the way. We are creating radical lefties with tax dollars and store dollars every day.

The findings were unsettling, though perhaps not surprising to longstanding opponents of such programs. Using carefully controlled experiments, researchers found that exposure to anti-oppressive rhetoric consistently amplified perceptions of bias where none existed.

In one experiment, participants read excerpts from Robin DiAngelo and Ibram X. Kendi, juxtaposed against a neutral control text about corn production. Afterward, they were asked to evaluate a hypothetical scenario: an applicant being rejected from an elite university.

Those exposed to the DEI materials were far more likely to perceive racism in the admissions process, despite no evidence to support such a conclusion.

Those exposed to the DEI materials were also more likely to advocate punitive measures, such as suspending the admissions officer or mandating additional DEI training.

Again, not shocking to conservatives. But should be eye opening for the average, unengaged American who thinks DEI is just about being diverse and friendly.

Colin goes on to show that the same pattern shows up in anti-Islamophobia studies and Caste studies, where people who took the trainings assumed discrimination when there was no evidence to support it.

And the people who were influenced by all these trainings, it made a big impact in their mindset.

Those people were also more likely to endorse dehumanizing rhetoric, including adapted quotes from Adolf Hitler where the term 'Jew' was replaced with 'Brahmin.'

The findings suggest that these programs may not only fail to address systemic injustice but actively cultivate divisive and authoritarian mindsets.

All it takes is a corporate HR training program and pushing DEI to get some people to say, "Hey, that Hitler guy might have made some good points."

And Wright concludes that, as troubling as this study is, what's more troubling is how the "mainstream" media decided to cover it up.

Critics of DEI have long pointed to its lack of empirical support, and the NCRI study adds weight to those concerns.

As troubling as the study's findings are, its suppression may be even more consequential. The decision to withhold this research from public discourse speaks to a larger issue: the growing entanglement of ideology and information.

The public deserves to know if the tools being deployed to foster 'equity' and 'anti-racism' are instead causing harm.

As DEI programs continue to expand across schools, workplaces, and governments, the stakes could not be higher. Whether this research sparks a broader reckoning or remains buried will depend on whether institutions -- and the media that hold them accountable -- are willing to confront uncomfortable truths.

You can read his entire writeup here.

Bloomberg and The Times might not like it, but to make the world a better place, DEI must DIE.


P.S. Now check out our latest video ๐Ÿ‘‡

Keep up with our latest videos โ€” Subscribe to our YouTube channel!

Ready to join the conversation? Subscribe today.

Access comments and our fully-featured social platform.

Sign up Now
App screenshot