In another attempt to completely confuse language and make it impossible to speak the truth when it comes to issues of sexuality and gender, transgender activists online are trying to tell you and the media that the phrase "biological males" is, get this, an anti-trans slur.

Kate Sosin, who, according to their Twitter bio, is a "proud trans person" (i.e. a biological male) wants to encourage debate but also make it impossible for the other side of the debate to clearly communicate their argument.

Sosin, who is a reporter for 19th News, a gender-focused news outlet, is seriously telling the media that if someone uses the phrase "biological male" to describe a biological male who thinks they are a female, that the news organization should point out that the other side is bigoted and using a "slur."

But yes, it's "totally OK to have the debate," but the other side cannot voice their opinion without being insulted and slandered because they appeal to the scientific truth that a man is a man and a woman is a woman. Or, as Albert Mohler has so eloquently put it, "ontology trumps autonomy." It doesn't matter what you personally believe, the truth will always win out in the end.

But what could be behind this idea that personal autonomy and our "lived experience" is more important than scientific, biological, ontological reality? Why, it's nothing more than a rejection of nature and the natural order.

Sosin makes this abundantly clear when she retweets another trans activist, a Vox contributor, who makes this incredibly revealing argument.

There you have it, clear as day. The reason "biological male" is a slur is because "it's an appeal to nature which is inherently biased against our lived experience."

This calls for another Jackie Chiles gif.

The interesting thing is that both sides are arguing the same thing. Both sides say that biology and science, ontological reality, are opposed to the lived experience of the transgender person. However, according to the trans side, it's their "lived experience" or personal autonomy that should triumph when the two contradict.

This argument is elevating the self, 'lived experience," over the created order of nature. The individual and what they decide is true is more important, to the trans individual, than ACTUAL REALITY.

I think it's clear, we cannot let the other side in this debate on gender define the terms, or guide the conversation. When they decide the parameters of the debate you see things like parents thrown in jail for "misgendering" their children. We must stick to reality and speak the truth in order to fight back against this transgender insanity.