If you need a good laugh at the spiraling state of the world today, here's a good one for you.

Jane Ward, a Cali professor of gEnDeR and sExUaLiTy sTuDies, wants us all to know that heterosexual relationships are really bad for society.

This is the glowing intro that Insider had for Ward in an article they published last month (warning, the article has adult language):

"Ward, a lesbian, has spent years researching the history of heterosexuality and its legacy."

Ah, yes, "the history of heterosexuality and its legacy," otherwise known as "how the human race has managed to reproduce and survive."

Insider then says that Ward (who published a book called "The Tragedy of Heterosexuality" last year) feels "sorry" for men and women who commit to relationships:

"It really looks like straight men and women don't like each other very much, that women spend so much time complaining about men, and we still have so much evidence of misogyny. From an LGBT perspective, [being straight] looks actually very tragic."

Ward then talked more about tOxiC mAsCuLiNiTy, how men are basically the worst, and how heterosexuality promotes inequality. Her advice for men is to "recognize that equity and feminism are actually really central to a healthy and happy relationship."

She can say all this, of course, because there are no reports of toxic relationships in the LGBT community. Nope, not even one.

After arguing a la Romans 1 why we should give into the sinful desires of our hearts to sexual impurity for the degrading of our bodies, Ward then attacks gender reveal parties and weddings before going straight for the jugular: the very notion of "male" and "female" itself.

Insider tells us of the strange "concept" that there are only two genders before quoting Ward's thoughts on this weird and foreign idea:

"Straight culture is based in a presumption that men and women are really different kinds of people, that they want different things, that they have different interests, and that they are sort of opposite," said Ward. "And they come together sexually and romantically because opposites attract."

Or, you know, that "presumption" is derived from basic biology, psychology, and a preschool level of common sense and observation.

Then came the most laughable part of the whole article:

"Through her research, Ward found that the concepts of heterosexuality and homosexuality came into existence in the 19th century. Before then, people didn't consider the gender or sex of the person they were having sex with as way to label themselves."

Oh how our forefathers must be laughing at us!

I mean, you could take that statement and frame it because of its spectacular comedy factor.

Insider then asserts that the notion of dichotomous sex and male-female relationships magically appeared after a Hungarian journalist coined the term "hetero- and homo-sexual" in the 1860s.

I mean, sure, the Bible has asserted for thousands of years that God made humanity male and female in His image (Genesis 1:27) and that the reason children leave their parents is to unite with a husband or wife (Genesis 2:24), but I'm glad Insider corrected that silly misunderstanding.

The trash article concluded by saying this harmful narrative "taught people that opposite-sex attraction, love, and family planning was the most natural way to do things."

Or, alternatively, that's the way it was designed, and faithful homes of devoted husbands and wives have literally built civilization and reflect the very image of God.

But again, you'd have to have a 5-year-old's understanding of science, history, theology, and observation to know that.