Imagine for a moment that Trump were president again. Let the wave of either elation or nausea wash over you, and then imagine that senior leaders of the U.S. military were using official Pentagon social accounts to attack Anderson Cooper at CNN.
How would the media respond?
Now switch Trump for Biden and Anderson Cooper for Tucker Carlson at Fox.
Then watch this video:
This is the Senior Enlisted Leader of U.S. Space Command – Master Gunnery Sgt. Scott Stalker – badgering a member of the free press. And not in his private capacity, mind you, but IN UNIFORM while IN his office from his OFFICIAL government account.
Not only that, but he mischaracterized what Tucker said... big time. Tucker had no qualms with women serving in the military. He took issue with a proposition to send pregnant women and their unborn children into active, live-fire combat zones. This is something spelled out explicitly by army vet and mom-of-two Virgina Krauta at the Daily Caller.
Tucker was also upset about the military focusing on diVeRsiTy while China is aiming to be more LETHAL:
"We've got new hairstyles and maternity flight suits. Pregnant women are going to fight our wars. This is a mockery of the US military. While China's military becomes more masculine as it's assembled the world's largest navy, our military needs to become, as Joe Biden says, more feminine. Whatever feminine means anymore, since men and women no longer exist."
Yet Stalker bashed Tucker for not having served as the basis for his ideas being wrong. That's dangerous. If the military has no respect for the people it protects, we're in deep trouble.
It wasn‘t just this account, however. An official account of the U.S. Marines attacked Tucker - something immediately called out by lawyer Jenna Ellis:
That account then went on to verbally attack average citizens:
This ain‘t good! Remember how Trump was called a dictator who wanted to suppress freedom of the press when he called CNN "fake news?" And yet here we have actual official Pentagon accounts taking a partisan political stand against the press. What the heck is going on?
Even Lefty outlets have to admit this is "unprecedented."
Take this piece by the Daily Beast as an example.
I'll leave you with a few thoughts from our Founding Fathers. I come from a military family. I saw the sacrifice one makes for one's nation while in uniform. With that being said, as our military becomes ever more entwined with the D.C. Swamp and goes Woke, it becomes the ideological tool that said Founders were the most afraid of above all else.
Here's what George Mason had to say in 1787:
"No man has a greater regard for the military gentlemen than I have. I admire their intrepidity, perseverance, and valor. But when once a standing army is established in any country, the people lose their liberty. When, against a regular and disciplined army, yeomanry are the only defense — yeomanry, unskilful and unarmed, — what chance is there for preserving freedom? Give me leave to recur to the page of history, to warn you of your present danger. Recollect the history of most nations of the world. What havoc, desolation, and destruction, have been perpetrated by standing armies!"
And here's Alexander Hamilton:
"If circumstances should at any time oblige the government to form an army of any magnitude that army can never be formidable to the liberties of the people while there is a large body of citizens, little, if at all, inferior to them in discipline and the use of arms, who stand ready to defend their own rights and those of their fellow-citizens. This appears to me the only substitute that can be devised for a standing army, and the best possible security against it, if it should exist."
Meanwhile, while the Pentagon is busy ramping up its attacks on the press...
Take us, Emperor Xi! Take us now!