Wokies upset by launch of Wikipedia competitor "Grokipedia"

Image for article: Wokies upset by launch of Wikipedia competitor "Grokipedia"

Joel Abbott

Oct 28, 2025

Wikipedia is controlled by an army of woke armchair quarterbacks who inject their ideology into everything, so now we have "Grokipedia" as an alternative πŸ˜‚

Woke tech media doesn't seem to be happy.

Don't skip past this gem of a headline.

WIRED's editors made sure to throw "far-right" in there, then connected "far-right" to the arguments that:

  1. Porn use has fueled sexual degeneracy across our culture, which inevitably has led to more sexually-transmitted diseases, and,

  2. Transgenderism is a social contagion, or a fad, pushed by blitz marketing across the internet in recent years.

Neither one of those claims is false. You may debate the extent that pornography affected the spread of AIDs, and you may debate the extent to which social media has affected the rise of transgenderism, but you'd only say these arguments are "false" if you are a far-left media outlet masquerading as objective news.

WIRED wasn't the only one angry at Grokipedia. The mods on Wikipedia seemed to be in a curfuffle as well.

In a striking masterclass proving why an alternative to Wikipedia is needed, Wikipedia's article even made sure to reference Elon's "Nazi salute."

Grokipedia does not allow human edits, but utilizes X's Grok LLM to check for accuracy and allows users to send feedback if they feel like an entry is in error.

A few examples show that Grokipedia does not avoid politically incorrect language like Wikipedia often does:

Whether or not the website will be more accurate than Wikipedia or other encyclopedias remains to be seen, but it has certainly ruffled a few feathers!


P.S. Now check out our latest video πŸ‘‡

Keep up with our latest videos β€” Subscribe to our YouTube channel!