As the forces of sexual anarchy inaugurate another oxymoronic "pride month," it is becoming obvious that as the calamitous effects of their movement continue manifesting, its cultural momentum is slowing.
Not the Bee reported yesterday on the increasing number of companies that have apparently chosen to omit their yearly self-debasement on the altar of depravity.
It seems an appropriate time, then, to reflect on what may be remembered as the single most unintentionally instructive, self-own in the history of corporate "pride" tributes. In a 2017 homage to Amsterdam's summer LGBT festivities, KLM Royal Dutch Airlines posted this classic:
It was yet another proof that despite humanity's best efforts to shroud it, the light of truth has a way of piercing the darkness.
While more than a few observers pointed at the ad's obvious demonstration of biological realities (eg, which parts fit with which parts), there was a sadder, far more serious, far more important truth being unintentionally revealed by the ad.
The purpose of a seatbelt is to keep the individual safe, secure, and free from harm. Without complimentary latching parts, however, a seatbelt is at once useless and counterproductive to achieving that objective. Ironically, KLM Royal Dutch Airlines' own operational policies forbid pilots to even depart the gate until all passengers are properly restrained by functional belts.
Should a passenger attempt to tie two "female" ends or two "male" ends together as a substitute, they would be reprimanded and, depending on their stubbornness, denied the opportunity to fly.
Are the executives, pilots, and flight attendants at KLM bigots for their intolerant belief that one type of seatbelt arrangement is superior in functionality and safety? Are they discriminators for requiring customers to abide by their narrow-minded view of the "appropriate way" to fasten a belt? Or are they merely expressing a self-evident truth that all of us know, even if we want, for whatever reason, to deny?
God's design was intentional, and His moral guidelines for sexuality were given to us not to deprive us, but to defend us. Defend us from the deadly consequences that come from selfishly and belligerently choosing our own way, even when it's packaged under the cheery façade of a rainbow.
P.S. Now check out our latest video 👇
Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of Not the Bee or any of its affiliates.