Yes, the dystopian dictators Down Under are now touting the phrase "New World Order" unironically.
Listen to Dr. Kerry Chant, the chief health officer in the state of New South Wales:
She's not the only one using the term.
That's pretty messed up.
I'm not just talking about people using the phrase "New World Order," either. The fact that Australia – where 15 people under 50 have died from this "pandemic" – is using Covid to trace everyone's movements everywhere at all times is BEYOND messed up.
At least in a place like China, you know the government is tracking you because they are a bunch of godless commies who want power at all costs.
It's a thousand times worse when a government pretends they care about your rights and health in order to expand their newly-founded empire.
"Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies." – C.S. Lewis
That's not all though.
Our virtuous fAcT-cHeCkErs are out there stumping for the Aussie tyrants. They want you to know that "New World Order" is simply a phrase that means "changing times."
YouTube is also putting a warning on videos to signal that you're a conspiracy theorist if you wonder why this term is being used:
In case you didn't know, the term "New World Order" comes from this 1940 book of the same name, written by H.G. Wells, the same guy that wrote "War of the Worlds."
Unlike authors like George Orwell, Aldous Huxley, G.K. Chesterton, and C.S. Lewis, who argued that a globalist, socialist government run by "scientists" was bad for humanity, Wells actually believed it would be GOOD for us.
Here is one quote from his book:
It is the system of nationalist individualism and uncoordinated enterprise that is the world's disease, and it is the whole system that has to go. It has to be reconditioned down to its foundations or replaced.
Sounds familiar, eh?
He also says this about how the Soviets had failed to implement "real" socialism:
The new and complete Revolution can be defined in a very few words. It is (a) outright world-socialism, scientifically planned and directed, plus (b) a sustained insistence upon law, law based on a fuller, more jealously conceived resentment of the personal Rights of Man, plus (c) the completest freedom of speech, criticism and publication, and sedulous expansion of the educational organisation to the ever-growing demands of the new order. What we may call the eastern or Bolshevik Collectivism, the Revolution of the Internationale, has failed to achieve even the first of these three items and it has never even attempted the other two.
Putting it at its compactest, it is the triangle of Socialism, Law and Knowledge, which frames the Revolution which may yet save the world.
And this:
Countless people, from maharajas to millionaires and from pukkha sahibs to pretty ladies, will hate the new world order, be rendered unhappy by frustration of their passions and ambitions through its advent and will die protesting against it.
How will this New World order arrive?
There will be no day of days then when a new world order comes into being. Step by step and here and there it will arrive, and even as it comes into being it will develop fresh perspectives, discover unsuspected problems and go on to new adventures.
So here it is from the horse's mouth. That's what the man who popularized the term "New World Order" thought about the matter, and how the term has been used for more than 8 decades. Leftist leaders, from intellectuals such as Noam Chomsky to top-level politicians have co-opted the term to aim for the rise of pseudo-socialist global cooperation and governance at the expense of individual sovereignty and freedoms. You don't need to think politicians are lizard people to rationally conclude their worldview finds many common points with Wells!
Yet the fact-checkers want you to simply believe that this means we're talking about "cultural shift."
What a time to be alive!
P.S. Now check out our latest video 👇
