BREAKING: New York Times uses words "Unborn Child," "Women" in article about citizenship ๐Ÿ‘€
ยท Jan 22, 2025 ยท NottheBee.com

THIS IS NOT A DRILL: THE CLUMPS OF CELLS ARE BABIES AGAIN AND THE BIRTHING PEOPLE ARE WOMEN AGAIN. ๐Ÿšจ

Why is this a news story?

Because the media routinely uses terms like "chestfeeder," "people who bleed," "birthing person," or even "human milk-feeding individual" when referring to women (sometimes "cis woman" makes the cut).

And it uses "fetus" or "embryo" when talking about abortion.

But now that they want everyone to see how mean Trump's deportation policy is, they suddenly started calling them "women" and "children" again.

FUNNY HOW THAT WORKS!

Ms. Calderas, who is from Guatemala, said Mr. Trump's move stirred anxiety and uncertainty about the future of her family and especially her son. 'It worries me that the new president doesn't want to give citizenship to our baby,' she said. 'This is where he will go to school and grow up. He will speak English like an American.'

A PREGNANT WOMAN WITH A BABY!

In The New York Times! In 2025!

They must really want to convince us of something.

I wonder what that is? ๐Ÿค”


P.S. Now check out our latest video ๐Ÿ‘‡

Keep up with our latest videos โ€” Subscribe to our YouTube channel!

Ready to join the conversation? Subscribe today.

Access comments and our fully-featured social platform.

Sign up Now
App screenshot