We're getting in the fight:
Do you remember this story from May 2023?
Chris Rufo of City Journal and the Manhattan Institute exposed multiple doctors at Texas Children's Hospital who were giving cross-sex hormones to children, in direct contradiction to Texas law.
After the story broke, the Biden Department of Justice investigated and charged the anonymous whistleblower, surgeon Dr. Eithan Haim, with four counts of violating HIPAA.
The hospital also fired a nurse that helped reveal the hospital's illegal program - that is, after FBI agents showed up to her door to harass her.
Texas AG Ken Paxton is investigating the hospital, but gag orders remain on information related to the case against Dr. Haim.
We want to know why Biden's government refuses to explain itself.
From Harmeet Dhillon's link:
The Dhillon Law Group, on behalf of client Not the Bee, LLC, has taken legal action to unseal critical documents in the criminal case against Dr. Eithan Haim, a whistleblower accused of exposing controversial transgender medical practices on minors, at Texas Children's Hospital.
Filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas, the motion aims to make public docket entries 101, 104, 107, and 108, which were sealed without clear justification.
Dr. Haim's revelations about these medical procedures have ignited fierce debate across the country, drawing attention from politicians, legal scholars, and media outlets. Critics have labeled the prosecution of Dr. Haim as retaliatory, claiming it seeks to silence dissenting voices in an area of intense public and political concern.
Biden's DOJ using secretive lawfare to destroy American citizens for opposing radical gender theory?
Whether it's the manifesto of the school shooter in Nashville or whistleblower documents related to gender surgeries on Texas kids, courts absolutely love to shut down the release of information related to transgenderism so that no one gets the idea that radical gender theory is incorrect or to blame for any of society's ills.
But lack of transparency doesn't make the problems go away.
Not the Bee Co-Founder and CEO Dan Dillon explains why it is essential for the American public to have all the facts about this case. 👇
At Not the Bee, we make a living from finding humor in the absurd, but this case is no laughing matter. When a doctor risks everything to shine a light on medical practices involving children, especially in the controversial realm of gender transitions, the public has a right to see the full picture.
The sealed documents in this case could provide the public with evidence that this case was justified - or, it could show that the government is harassing Dr. Haim without any justification other than blind obedience to the woke religion. Here are a few reasons that the whole thing is sketchy, straight from the motion we have filed with the U.S. District Court in Southern Texas:
First, immediately after the hearing and before the second superseding indictment was filed, a filing was made under seal, with no description.
Second, a government attorney filed a motion to withdraw as counsel of record for the United States. Though the filing was entirely under seal, the court then granted the motion and provided the title of the motion.
Third, on November 20, 2024, the government moved for a gag order to prevent Dr. Haim and his counsel from making public statements or talking to the press, except for statements that merely recite, without any characterization, matters of public record. For this motion, the government filed two exhibits under seal and described them as tweets from Dr. Haim and his counsel. The government characterized the tweets as demonstrating that the 'defendant and his counsel have now crossed a line, bombarding social media with inaccurate and inflammatory descriptions of pretrial proceedings that would never be admissible before a jury.'
We believe none of these elements provide justification for the government's efforts in quieting information regarding this case, especially considering the fact that we live in, well, AMERICA.
Sealing a document constitutes a prior restraint, and it is 'constitutional only if the government demonstrates that the protected speech restrained poses a ‘clear and present danger, or a serious or imminent threat to a protected competing interest.'" Davis, 78 F.3d at 928 (quoting CBS Inc. v. Young, 522 F.2d 234, 238 (6th Cir. 1975)). Furthermore, '[t]he restraint must be narrowly drawn and cannot be upheld if reasonable alternatives are available having a lesser impact on First Amendment freedoms.'
Harmeet Dhillon has this to say about the motion:
Transparency in this case is essential -- not just for justice but for public trust in the system. The requested sealing these documents is inconsistent with applicable law, violates the public right to examine the government's conduct, and further would deprive the public of the First Amendment right to hear commentary about a matter of significant public interest -- namely, the prosecution of a whistleblower raising alarm about alleged medical misconduct and mistreatment of minors in Texas.
Thanks to Dhillon Law Group for their work in filing this motion.
Oh, and thanks to the hacktivists at the SPLC for their lame attempts to dox us last week -- that made us even more determined to speak up and protect kids than ever before. 😤
I'll leave you with this January interview with Dr. Haim that outlines why he decided to be brave and say something about what was happening at Texas Children's Hospital:
People need to hear the truth. People need to hear what happened.
💯
P.S. Now check out our latest video 👇
