Following a federal judge's scrapping of the Biden administration's ongoing mask mandate on mass transit, many liberals responded by vowing to continue to mask up anyway cause that's just how they roll.
Among them was former Obama senior advisor Valerie Jarrett:
Wearing my mask no matter what non-scientists tell me I can do.
You do you, Valerie! Late this week, however, eagle-eyed commentator Stephen Miller noted a bit of...inconsistency in Ms. Jarrett's mask philosophy:
Yep, that's the lady herself, hanging out with her former boss without even so much as a solitary scrap of porous fabric on her face:
Jarrett was not pleased with this commentary and logged on to inform Stephen Miller that she was, in fact, being highly scientific in her selective application of masks:
LOL. Valerie, Valerie, this is a game defense, but...
If you are, in fact, fully vaccinated, and you did in fact "test negative [the] same day," why did you feel the need to wear the mask in the auditorium? Were you worried you were going to infect someone in spite of having tested negative? Were you worried you were going to get infected and seriously ill in spite of having been vaccinated?
Conversely, if you felt it was necessary to wear the mask in the auditorium even though you were vaxxed and tested negative, why didn't you wear the mask around the "very small group?"
It seems like you were being either (a) needlessly performative for the sake of political optics while in the auditorium, or (b) completely reckless and dangerous while hanging out with the former president.
Which is it? Ms. Jarrett, if you're reading this, we invite you to offer some clarification in the comments below!
P.S. Now check out our latest video 👇
