Guys ... just how bad of a candidate is Kamala Harris?

The LA Times - The LOS ANGELES FREAKIN' TIMES - isn't going to endorse ANY candidate this time around, even when the former senator and AG from California is on the top of the ticket.

If you doubt my assertion about how far-left the paper is, hear it from a leftist:

Is Kamala so toxic that far-left newspapers in her own state won't have anything to do with her??

The owner of the Los Angeles Times has blocked the paper from endorsing a candidate for president this year.

Last week, the LA Times published its electoral endorsements for the 2024 election. And while the paper noted in its first line that it is 'no exaggeration to say this may be the most consequential election in a generation,' that was the only mention of the presidential race in its endorsements.

According to Semafor, the Times was preparing to endorse a candidate but the owner put a stop to it.

But according to two people familiar with the situation, executive editor Terry Tang told editorial board staff earlier this month that the paper would not be endorsing a candidate in the presidential election this cycle, a decision that came from the paper's owner Dr. Patrick Soon-Shiong, a doctor who made his fortune in the healthcare industry.

The paper did not explain its decision, though it noted at the bottom of its online endorsement page that 'the editorial board endorses selectively, choosing the most consequential races in which to make recommendations.'

Maybe it's just new ownership, maybe they didn't want to be associated with Kamala. The lefties certainly think it's because the billionaires are all aligning with Trump to stop the communist revolution.

Whatever the reason, the LA Times not endorsing a candidate for the first time in five election cycles is wild.

P.S. Now check out our latest video 👇