What do you think is a greater threat to democracy: A bunch of unarmed, uncoordinated, low-information goobers running around the Capitol building for a few hours, or the literal attempted assassination of a sitting justice of the Supreme Court due to an imminent court decision?
Yeah, obviously, you know what the answer is. But does the New York Times?
Well:
That's right: The most important paper in America thinks it's more important that this happened a year and a half ago...
...than that one of the country's most important jurists came within a few miles of being shot and killed.
The Jan. 6 riot disrupted congressional proceedings for like six-and-a-half hours. Brett Kavanaugh's assassination may very well have ripped the nation in two like a wet newspaper.
You know which is the more important and consequential news item. Why do you think The New York Times doesn't?
P.S. Now check out our latest video 👇
