A bombshell new report indicates that one-in-six Biden voters would have changed their vote if they had known about the scandals surrounding Joe Biden or the successes of the Trump administration.
"The survey results report that 17 percent of Biden voters would not have voted for the Biden-Harris presidential ticket if they had known about at least one of the eight news stories that were suppressed by big tech and mainstream media outlets," said Jordan Davidson of The Federalist.
Before continuing, take a moment to let that sink in. If accurate, the Media Research Center's survey of 1,750 sample Biden voters in seven swing states would have easily swung the vote in Trump's favor, even without all that lovely, totally-not-widespread election fraud that was a figment of our imaginations.
Here were some of the topics that voters said would have changed their minds:
- Sexual assault allegations against Biden by former staffer Tara Reade
- The massive scandals and federal investigation continuing to swirl around Hunter Biden
- Kamala Harris's voting record in the Senate being more extreme than Bernie Sanders
- The nation's economic jump in the third quarter of 2020
- Millions of jobs added under Trump, including record-low 3.6% unemployment before the pandemic
- America's energy independence solidified under Trump
- The success of Operation Warp Speed in developing a 'Rona vaccine
- Trump's multiple historic peace deals in the Middle East
Some of the most shocking poll questions revealed more than 25% of Biden voters didn't know Harris is the most far-left member of the Senate and 49% didn't know how much the economy recovered over the summer and early fall.
I have to wonder if these voters know about Biden's racist statements, too.
Exactly how much would this have affected the election?
"The president would have won the electoral college 311 to 227," said Brent Bozell, president of Media Research Center.
British TV host Piers Morgan – who is totally a super alt-right Trump-loving neo-Nazi – wrote a piece Thursday admitting that even he can understand how such blatant media dishonesty has skyrocketed cultural division to new heights. Morgan asks us to imagine a theoretical world where the election had smoothly been called for Donald Trump:
"Imagine that just before the election, a major US newspaper had published an explosive story about... Donald Trump Jr. based around the contents of his personal laptop that revealed extensive dodgy dealings with people from foreign countries, some very unfriendly to the United States, and which even suggested his father may have been involved in some of those dealings?
Now imagine that in this eventuality, and with none of the key elements of the story denied by the Trumps, 90% of America's mainstream media deliberately refused to cover the story, and social media giants like Twitter and Facebook actively suppressed it altogether?"
Are you imagining? How would the media have covered it? What would the outcry have been?
"Finally, imagine waking up today to hear that rather than Hunter Biden being formally investigated by federal authorities from the Justice Department over his financial affairs, as is the case, it was Donald Trump Jr.
And that the investigation has been ongoing since 2018 but was 'paused' in case it affected the election.
And that it has looked at allegations of potential criminal violations of tax and money laundering laws. And that it is now in front of a Delaware Grand Jury with a view to indictment.
By now, some of you might be screaming that the election was 'rigged' and 'stolen' from Joe Biden, right?"
Morgan, of course, also believes that Trump is being "hysterical" in his claims of actual fraud at the polls, but it's telling that even a far-left media personality such as himself is willing to call it like he sees it in this case. Perhaps it's because he's gotten a personal taste of the media establishment's tactics over the whole story:
"Equally shamefully, the media responded by then trying to censor me too: I was dropped from an appearance on Brian Stelter's CNN media show after going on Fox News and lambasting news organizations like my former CNN employers for refusing to follow up the Post's Biden exposé."
The leftist media loves to portray anything against their narrative as an Info Wars-adjacent conspiracy theory that only uneducated hillbillies would believe. When you have a guy like Piers Morgan agreeing that the media weaponized their resources to actively change the results of a presidential election in their favor, what does that mean?
And when that media is effectively a mouthpiece for one political party, what does that mean?
And when that political party seeks to weaponize media, Big Tech, and corporate allies to silence its foes at all costs, what does that mean?
How can a country move forward in such a state?
I'll leave you with that thought.