It's not just the New York Times that thinks kids should be exposed to "kink" in Disney films.

It's an entire movement of people who think that kids need to be exposed to sexual kink at seemingly every turn. Libs of TikTok has brought us a real doozy this time:

If you're wondering, dictionary.com defines kink as "bizarre or unconventional sexual preferences or behavior."

Apparently, this person said something previously that implied that kids maybe shouldn't be exposed to all sorts of sexual deviancies, and this is how she apologized or explained the misunderstanding.

I wanna clarify this for a second here. I'm not saying that kink isn't kid friendly. I'm saying that kids and kink can coexist at pride in a totally fine way... Making an event kid-friendly doesn't mean sanitizing it, aka taking something like kink out of pride.

Yeah, because normal people totally like to bring their kids to "kink" festivals where men can dress in thongs and whip each other in public. If you aren't taking the overt sexuality out of the festival, then how in the heck is it kid-friendly?

What they mean is that they WANT kids to be exposed to deviant sexuality. That's the goal.

Guys, I am having to tap the sign way too often. Here, I'll let Auron do it himself this time.