Supreme Court Nominee Ketanji Brown Jackson Can’t Define What A Woman Is: “I’m Not A Biologist”
· Mar 23, 2022 · NottheBee.com

Ladies and gentlemen, and I DO mean ladies and gentlemen, we are officially in Clown World.

Did anyone think we would get to the point in society where defining the word woman would be so controversial that a Supreme Court nominee would not answer the question?

Yet in 2022, here we are.

Watch as Tennessee Senator Marsha Blackburn asks Supreme Court nominee Ketanji Brown Jackson to simply define the word "woman."

I cannot believe my eyes and ears. A nominee to the Supreme Court was tripped up by the Matt Walsh test of sanity:

Blackburn: Can you provide a definition of the word woman?

Jackson: Can I provide a definition? I can't.

Blackburn: You can't?

Jackson: I'm not a biologist.

What has happened to our society where the Left now thinks you have to be a literal biologist to know what a woman is?

Maybe Jackson needs to talk with a certain British woman:

You don‘t have to be a vet to know what a dog is and you don't have to be a biologist to know what a woman is.

Let me break it down in simple terms for the judge:

For literally all of human history this has been such an easy question to answer. Now, thanks to the gender revolution, lefties are unable to answer simple questions about humanity.

It's not that Judge Brown doesn't know the answer, she simply refuses to answer the questions on political grounds.

Forget CRT, forget the leniency on sex crimes. This and this alone should disqualify anyone from the high court.


P.S. Now check out our latest video: Oh CNN wants Republicans back now? 😂👇

Keep up with our latest videos — Subscribe to our YouTube channel!

Comments

There are 56 comments on this article.

Ready to join the conversation? Start your free trial today.

Access comments and our fully-featured social platform, completely free of charge.

Sign up Now
App screenshot

You must signup or login to view or post comments on this article.